I had anticipated this. Under Ohio HOA law, ORC section 5312.08, any resident may raise items under new business as long as they are germane to community governance. A board president cannot unilaterally limit new business discussion time when quorum is present. I had printed that statute. I had given copies to Warren Taft, to Cornelius Brandt, and to four other residents who planned to attend.
I had also quietly invited two journalists—one from the Clearfield Gazette, one from a regional outlet running a series on HOA abuses in Ohio—to attend as members of the public. The meeting was technically open. I told them what was happening. I gave them the documents. I asked them to come and observe. They said yes.
The meeting was in seven days. The HUD investigators were scheduled to arrive in ten. Beverly knew neither of those things.
The week before the meeting, Beverly was in constant motion, and I was perfectly still. She was making calls, sending emails, knocking on doors—the relentless churn of someone trying to control a situation that has already slipped away from them. She had Patricia Weld draft a formal response to the HUD complaint, acknowledging vague administrative oversights without accepting responsibility. She had Doug Pelham prepare talking points. She asked the Ohio HOA Management Association, off the record, whether a board president could be personally shielded from liability in a federal Fair Housing complaint. She was told this was a "nuanced question." That's attorney language for no.
I, meanwhile, had gone quiet in a way that made people who knew me pay attention. I wasn't attending the hallway conversations. I was at home, at my kitchen table, going through documents. I was not anxious. I've been in situations where the cost of the wrong move was measured in lives. Beverly Kratch and her clipboard were not that. I knew exactly what I was doing.
The last piece was a physical one. At Franklin's suggestion, I hired a professional accessibility compliance surveyor, a woman named Darcy Stanton who ran an ADA audit firm out of Columbus. She came to Maplewood Commons on a Thursday, walked the entire parking lot with a measuring wheel and a checklist, and produced a written report within 48 hours.
The report documented four additional ADA compliance deficiencies beyond space 7:
-
Faded signage on two other accessible spaces.
-
An access aisle two inches narrower than ADA-required minimums.
-
A ramp at the clubhouse entrance with a slope gradient that exceeded federal specifications.
None of these were my violations. All of them were on the property that had been funded by the federal grant that required ADA compliance—the property Beverly had been managing as board president for six years.