HOA Reported My Black Mom for Trespassing — Then Police Asked Who Owned the Property

HOA Reported My Black Mom for Trespassing — Then Police Asked Who Owned the Property

Chapter 12

Theme:
Font Size:
24px
It asked for six things:
  1. Immediate cessation of all new construction, grading, planting, and improvement on the described parcel;
  2. Removal of the sign asserting association ownership within fourteen days;
  3. Rescission of the retaliatory violations and fines issued against me, all four of them, and removal from my file;
  4. Production of any and all recorded instruments the association claimed granted it rights over the parcel, together with any renewal of the 2001 license;
  5. Reimbursement of survey and legal costs incurred to date;
  6. And an invitation, stated plainly, to negotiate a new written use agreement so that the community could continue to use the pathway and garden lawfully going forward.
That last item was my mother's, and she insisted on it, and she insisted on the word invitation.Celeste's response was to call an emergency meeting of the membership.The clubhouse seats about 140; there were more than that, standing along the back wall and out into the corridor. I sat in the fourth row on the aisle, my mother beside me, Graham on her other side with a leather folder on his knees, and Ruth Caldwell two rows behind us alone with her tote bag.Celeste ran the meeting from a lectern with a projector. She had slides. She had a laser pointer. She began by thanking everyone for coming out on short notice to address what she called "an urgent threat to community assets." And then she spent eleven minutes explaining that a "technicality" in an old county record had been discovered by a resident who intended to exploit it. She used the word "technicality" five times.She showed an aerial photograph of the garden with a red outline around it and said that a private party was asserting a claim to "this portion of your community." She said the association had maintained that land continuously for two decades and that such long use created rights. She said that legal defense would be expensive, but that the board had a duty to protect property values.Then she looked out at the room and said, "I'll be candid. Some people move into a community like this one and never really understand what Stonebridge Glen is about. They see an address; they don't see a neighborhood."She did not say my name; she did not need to. Two hundred people turned their heads in the same direction.And I sat there with my hands in my lap and understood that after everything, after the county records and the officers and the recording, she was still doing the identical thing she had done in my own driveway three years earlier: she was placing me outside. It was the only tool she had ever needed, and she could not put it down even when it had stopped working.She said the claim would close the path, destroy the garden, eliminate parking, and depress home values across the community. She asked for a vote authorizing legal defense funding.

News in the same category

HOA Reported My Black Mom for Trespassing — Then Police Asked Who Owned the Property

16 Part